The two stories talked about immigration, Mexican immigration in specific. They talked about reasons why/why not immigrants should be allowed in the U.S. While talking about immigration there was also politics involved. Politics have to be involved due to there being a law on illegal immigration. Other topics related include inequality, family, citizenship, poverty, etc. Immigration in the past compared to the present is similar and the policy/law should mirror that. The purpose is to educate the reader about the U.S/Mexico immigration. The writer compares his ancestors(his grandfather vs. Angel) tone is serious and dramatic.
Story 2
The second story was more about the reasons why illegal immigrants should not be allowed in the United States. It also talked about things such as cheap labor, identity, legality. Enforcement on illegal immigration isn't tough enough; U.S is complacent with illegal immigration; expectations are too low. Audience could be voters, people for open borders and amnesty. The story is very serious and authoritative.
Wednesday, March 25, 2015
Monday, March 23, 2015
Compare/Contrast paper
Intro--
-Setting your narrow topic
-Identifying articles/authors you're analyzing
-Tentative thesis (Final paper)
-Sources for consideration
Body of paper--
-Article by article approach
II. Article 1 summary
A. Point 1 (Ethos)
B. Point 2 (Pathos)
C. Point 3 (Logos)
III. Article 2 summary
A. Point 1
B. Point 2
C. Point 3
V. Direct comparison
-Point by point approach
II. Point A (Ethos)
A. Article 1
B. Article 2
III. Point B (Pathos)
A. Article 1
B. Article 2
V. Conclusion
A. Determine use of sources
B. Justification
-Setting your narrow topic
-Identifying articles/authors you're analyzing
-Tentative thesis (Final paper)
-Sources for consideration
Body of paper--
-Article by article approach
II. Article 1 summary
A. Point 1 (Ethos)
B. Point 2 (Pathos)
C. Point 3 (Logos)
III. Article 2 summary
A. Point 1
B. Point 2
C. Point 3
V. Direct comparison
-Point by point approach
II. Point A (Ethos)
A. Article 1
B. Article 2
III. Point B (Pathos)
A. Article 1
B. Article 2
V. Conclusion
A. Determine use of sources
B. Justification
Exploring Narrower Topics
Broad Topic:
Children’s toys
What’s involved?
Children
Parents
Friends
Narrower Topic:
Effect a toy has on children
Who’s involved?
Parents
Children
Company of the toy
Maker of the toy
Narrower Topic:
How does Barbie dolls influence body image?
What do I know about Barbie’s?
They are very common among young girls
It is a toy that most young girls grow up playing
with
Has the “ideal” body
Sold around the world
Question:
If Barbie dolls are common for young girls, what’s
making it cause a negative image?
Ideas:
The doll is perceived to be perfect
Makes girls try to look to that unrealistic
standard
Young girls look up to an image that is
unattainable
Question:
What negative impact do Barbie’s have on young
girls? What can it lead to when they become older?
Wednesday, March 18, 2015
TED talk
I think that the implied thesis is gossip shows who we really are as a society. A lot of people are embarrassed or it is frowned upon to gossip and read magazines about celebrities. The lady on ted talk made a lot of connections to gossiping. Whether it's about gender, sexuality, or cheating scandals it all shows us who we really are based on our opinions about the topics. She gave an example of how a few years back Chris Brown beat Rhianna yet he just won a grammy and we as a society are supporting his music.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)